Debashish Banerji Hindustan Times
As an Indian and a follower of Sri
Aurobindo, I feel it is really deplorable if what this report says is true
about the denial of visa extension to Peter Heehs. Not only is it a defeat to
the freedom of expression which is one of the pillars of the Indian
constitution, but it is a clear case of fraudulent action since Heehs' book has
nothing of a "blasphemous" nature. It seems to be a set-up and the
carrying out of unconstitutional decisions pressed into effect in a underhand
manner...
Thanks for being a sane voice in an ocean of
xenophobia. It seems from most of the other posts that a politicized divide is
being created. "Secular historians" like Ramchandra Guha and Romila
Thapar are being clubbed with sensationalist western academicians like Wendy
Doniger and Jeffrey Kripal, and Peter Heehs is being thrown into this league. I
guess on the other side are ardent Hindutva flag-bearers. An enlightened
spirituality is all but forgotten in the middle of this. It is also clear that
these violent voices have not read Heehs' book or else they have no reading
skills.
31 March 2012: Don't
expel US historian, govt told Addendum: The question about the relationship
between Sri Aurobindo and the Mother is only one of dozens of objections raised
by that handful of religious fundamentalists; it is not even mentioned in the
Orissa Gazette Notification. It is, however, what appears to produce the most
visceral effect in the public, for reasons we fail to understand. Heehs made it
perfectly clear that there was no sexual element at all in this relationship.
On the contrary, what he wrote underscores its profoundly sacred nature. Only
readers with a serious Freudian hang-up can fail to see this. — Editors, IYF. Recent
Additions
1 April 2012: Chidambaram
to decide on Heeh's visa
31 March 2012: Don't
expel US historian, govt told
10 March 2012: Those
who get upset by these things are worse
24 February 2012: Sri
Aurobindo, Heehs and the fragility of faith
9 August 2011: Review
by Antony Copley
31 July 2011: BAN
the BAN by Ramachandra Guha
SA used different terminologies and different
formulations in different texts, this doesn’t necessarily mean he abandoned one
for the other. debbanerji Posted
March 14, 2012 Permalink
Finally, the siddhis and anandas spoken of in the
Record are not addressed anywhere else but can clearly be seen in Sri Aurobindo
and the Mother’s own functioning. Comment on The Seven Quartets of Becoming by Debashish Banerji
by debbanerji from Comments for Posthuman Destinies by debbanerji Eyes open,
mind closed
Chidambaram won't allow US historian to stay in India Hindustan
Times - Aloke
Tikku, New Delhi, April 04, 2012 00:46 IST [Posted
by General Editor at 4/04/2012 07:34:00 AM] 8:47 AM, 9:10 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment